Educação na Web/Aula 3 - Fontes de Consulta

Slides da Aula

editar

Slide 3 - Wikipedia é confiável?[1]

Slide 4 - Wikipedia é confiável? Editorial da Nature e resposta da Britannica

 Slide 6 - Exploring the use of social media to measure journal article impact[2]

 Slide 7 - Wikimedia commons

 Slide 8 - It’s good to blog[3]

 Slide 9 - Small Things Considered

 Slide 10 - Blog do Carlos Orsi

 Slide 11 - The Loom

 Slide 12 - Not Exactly Rocket Science

 Slide 13 - ScienceBlogs Brasil

 Slide 14 - Gene Repórter

 Slide 15 - Periódico

 Slide 16 - WTF Evolution

 Slide 17 - @cienciahoje

 Slide 18 - @periodicobr

 Slide 19 - @neiltyson

 Slide 20 - @stevensrehen

 Slide 21 - Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network

 Slide 22 - Universo Racionalista

 Slide 23 - I Feaking Love Science

 Slide 24 - This Week in Virology, This Week in Microbiology e This Week in Parasitism

 Slide 25 - Dragões de Garagem

 Slide 26 - Fronteiras da Ciência

 Slide 27 - Scicast

 Slide 28 - Ted Education

 Slide 29 - YouTube Edu

 Slide 30 - Univesp

 Slide 32 - Tabela Periódica de Vídeos

 Slide 33 - Slide share

 Slide 34 - Khan Academy

 Slide 35 - Coursera

 Slide 36 - EMBRIAO

 Slide 38 - e-unicamp

 Slide 39 - Pandemic 2

Bibliografia

editar
  1. Giles, J. (2005). Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438(7070), 900–1. doi:10.1038/438900a
  2. Evans, P., & Krauthammer, M. (2011). Exploring the use of social media to measure journal article impact. Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium, 2011(January), 374–81.
  3. Blogs Editorial. (2009). It’s good to blog. Nature, 457(7233), 1058. doi:10.1038/4571058a